@jeremy-visionaid could you please take a look to this PR? I've used your validations as a guide for a code refactoring/fixing of stream sizes and calculation. This should make things more solid and predictables in stream size validations and calculations. Now all test passes (no change in test files required). BTW I've also found some errors that were masked and avoided by self adaption of stream-view in adjusting its size... Many thanks!

P.S.
Obviously review and comments are welcome from everyone interested!

@ironfede LGTM, though I'm currently no expert in CFB. I think we should also take #187 and #188 for belt and braces. I'm happy to rebase them on top of this if you want to merge this one first.

@ironfede LGTM, though I'm currently no expert in CFB. I think we should also take #187 and #188 for belt and braces. I'm happy to rebase them on top of this if you want to merge this one first.

Perfect! I'm going to merge first since changes are a little bit "deeper" in the core of size calculations so we can check after that if your new tests still works ok!

Many thx